![]() ![]() If not, the benefit is anycodings_css improved loading in parallel at the anycodings_css expense of no cross-platform redundancy. If anycodings_css so, the benefit is redundancy at the anycodings_css expense of possible improved loading in anycodings_css parallel. The important difference here is the anycodings_css cache-control value, where the exact anycodings_css version gets a max-age of 1 year, while anycodings_css the other gets a max-age value of 7 anycodings_css days.Īlso: Another area where CDN features anycodings_css may impact performance is whether they anycodings_css use multiple underlying CDNs or not. Via jsdelivr, with "latest patch anycodings_css version" feature (url) compression: brotliĬache-control: public, max-age=604800, s-maxage=43200 If anycodings_css using this on the same minor version of anycodings_css jQuery as above, here are the results: For anycodings_css example, Jsdelivr has a feature that anycodings_css allows one to leave off the exact anycodings_css version string (so that you can always anycodings_css get the latest patch version, for anycodings_css example) (view their features page). IMPORTANT: Be careful about how CDN anycodings_css features might impact cache-control anycodings_css headers (in a way that would degrade anycodings_css performance for your users). Be careful of performance impacts resulting from using specific CDN features.Ĭompare the same version of jQuery anycodings_css served by jQuery's CDN, jsDelivr, and anycodings_css cdnjs.Ĭache-control: public, max-age=31536000, s-maxage=31536000, immutable.Check the cache-control header (the longer it's set for the better, generally).This has direct impact on the payload size, though Brotli is not always smaller than Gzip (see below example). If the CDN is not using Brotli they're likely using gzip. The preferred option here is generally br (for Brotli). Check to see what type of compression the CDN uses (by looking for the content-encoding header.Three things to add (in addition to what anycodings_css chip points out): they are used on a single page anycodings_css and I don't want to load them everywhere) anycodings_css in this situation, using a CDN is probably anycodings_css better than loading them locally, hence my anycodings_css question. I usually use npm to download scripts into anycodings_css my dev environment and pack them in a single anycodings_css bundle but there are times when I want to anycodings_css keep one or more of those scripts non anycodings_css bundled (i.e. The first thing that comes into my mind is anycodings_css that there could be differences in how fast anycodings_css they are and how much they are used (so, if anycodings_css I use the one with the largest market share, anycodings_css I will be more likely to have my users anycodings_css already have the libraries in their anycodings_css browser's cache), but I'm not sure it this anycodings_css is just being nitpicky or if these anycodings_css reasonings are legitimate.Īlso, once I pick a CDN to load a script, anycodings_css are there valid reasons to always use the anycodings_css same for other scripts as well? anycodings_css BootstrapCDN, cdnjs, unpkg, jsDelivr and anycodings_css possibly others) but I don't understand when anycodings_css sould I use one over the others.Īs an example, examples in Bootstrap anycodings_css documentation show BootstrapCDN and anycodings_css jsDelivr, while aos's docs use unpkg, and so anycodings_css on. What kind of reasoning should I do in order anycodings_css to choose a specific CDN to load Javascript anycodings_css & CSS libraries into my website anycodings_css development projects? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |